References


 * References **

Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D.R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. //Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5//(2), 1–17. Retrieved on November 1st, 2011 from http://sloanconsortium.org/jaln/v5n2/assessing-teacher-presence-computer-conferencing-context

Biggs, J.B. (2003). //Teaching for quality learning at university//. Buckingham: Open University Press/Society for Research into Higher Education. (Second edition)

[|Bloom, B. S.], Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & [|Krathwohl, D. R.] (1956). //Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals; Handbook I: Cognitive Domain// New York, Longmans, Green.

Connolly, M., Jones, C. & Jones, N. (2007) New approaches, new vision: capturing teacher experiences in a brave new online world. //Open learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and eLearning// Vol 22, No.1, pp.43-56

Garrison, D.R. and Anderson, T. (2003) //E-learning in the 21st century: a framework for research and practice//. RoutledgeFalmer: London

Hara, N., Bonk, C., and Angeli, C. (2000) Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational sychology course. //Instructional Science//, Vol 28, pp. 115-152

Krathwohl, D. (2002) A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. //Theory into practice//, Vol 41, No. 4 pp. 212-264

Lehmann, K. & Chamberlin, L. (2009) //Making the move to elearning. Putting your course online.// Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Co

Vlachopoulos, P. and Cowan, J. (2010) Reconceptualising moderation in asynchronous online discussions using grounded theory // Distance Education // Vol. 31, No. 1, May 2010, pp. 23–36

Wickersham, L. and Dooley, K. (2006) A content analysis of critical thinking skills as an indicator of quality of online discussion in virtual learning communities. //Quarterly review of Distance Education//, Vol 7, No. 2 pp 185-193

Wilson Smith, T. and Colby, S. (2007) Teaching for deep learning. //The Clearing House: a journal of educational strategies, issues and ideas//. Vol 80, No. 5. P 205-210.